Last week's development in the Haditha case -- the dropping of
all the charges leveled against Lance Cpl. Stephan Tatum for actions
related to Haditha, Iraq -- drives another nail into the shameful
accusations made by Time magazine and Rep. John Murtha.
Time magazine, with an assist from the Pennsylvania Democrat,
sparked a legal and media inquisition against eight courageous United
States Marines. Both Time and Murtha claimed these Marines committed
cold-blooded murder in Haditha during a 2005 engagement.
They also alleged the Marines participated in covering up their alleged atrocities.
But after years of litigation and estimated $40 million in
taxpayer funds expended, none of the Marines have been found guilty of
committing murder or war crimes.
On Nov. 19, 2005, during an insurgent ambush of the Marines of
Kilo Company 3rd battalion 1st Marines, 15 Iraqi civilians and nine
suspected insurgent ambushers were killed. One Marine was killed in an
IED explosion and two others seriously wounded.
Thanks to the battalion intelligence officer, Lt. Jeff Dinsmore,
who monitored the daylong engagement, the entire Marine chain of
command were given the full story of the engagement that very night and
it was agreed that no further action in connection with the civilian
casualties was needed.
Months later, a Time story based on the testimony of two known
insurgent propagandists and the stories of some Iraqi civilians falsely
reported that the Kilo company Marines had wantonly murdered the dead
Iraqis as an act of revenge after an IED explosion took the life of a
fellow Marine.
On the basis of Time's unsubstantiated allegations alone, Murtha
publicly charged the Marines had gone on a rampage to avenge the
killing of their comrade in the IED explosion and had committed
cold-blooded murder. Time has been forced to issue four different
retractions of details in their report.
Before any investigation had gotten underway Murtha went on a
rampage of his own, attacking the Marines in venue after venue. In his
original charges against the Marines, Murtha said there was no gunfire
during the incident when there was in fact a daylong battle involving
heavy insurgent gunfire directed at the Marines starting at the time of
the IED explosion.
Typical of Murtha’s rantings were his comments on a May 28,
2006, ABC News broadcast. In response to George Stephanopolis’ comment
that he claimed to have been briefed several times since Nov. 19 and
said that that the evidence showed that the Marines had committed
cold-blooded murder, Murtha said:
“Well there’s no question in my mind, what happened was an IED
exploded. It killed one Marine. And then a taxi drives up. When the
taxi comes up there’s four of five people in it. And they shoot … shoot
those four or five people unarmed.
“And then they go on a rampage throughout the houses and kill
people. One woman, as I understand it, in talking to officials in the
Marine Corps, was kneeling over a child pleading for mercy and they
shot her in cold blood. That’s the thing that’s so disturbing. And even
more disturbing is the fact that we know that the Iraqis knew about it
because they made payments to the Iraqis for accidental deaths or
salacious deaths whatever you want to call it. And in addition to that,
they had … there has to have been a cover-up of this thing.”
In other comments, Murtha alleged that the Marines had never
encountered enemy gunfire. The claim was a total concoction. In fact,
the Marines engaged in a daylong battle involving heavy insurgent
gunfire immediately following the IED explosion.
Murtha claimed to have been given all these details from then-Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Hagee. Hagee denied it.
Since Murtha’s reckless claims, none of the Marines ended up
facing murder charges. Five of the eight have had all charges dropped
against them and only three still face courts martial and none for
murder.
The evidence produced in the cases showed that Time and Murtha were dead wrong in their charges.
There was no rampage, no cold-blooded murders of innocent
Iraqis. Yet eight United States Marines were subjected to an ordeal
that has wrecked their careers and cost them tens of thousands of
dollars in legal costs. We can "thank" Time and Murtha for this
outrage.
© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved. |