I was glad a friend called and asked me to see Avatar tonight. I hardly ever get out on to see a movie, especially on a weeknight. The film is the story of an ex-Marine who finds himself as an Avatar, a human mind in an alien body. He later becomes torn between two worlds, in a desperate fight for his own survival and that of an indigenous people. Avatar is an indictment of any culture that has ever mobilized to overpower and exploit another culture for it's own empirical gain. I did find myself seduced by the matriarchy, albeit innocence and computer-generated female-lead alien. She was clever, cat-like, slim, shapely and feminine, with soft sad eyes, oddly sexy. Plandora, the planet she hailed from, was a place moviegoers have never imagined; it was amazing. But that didn’t matter, I had no role in the movie, I was merely an observer. But it did matter to the Marine character in the movie, whose role to the mission changed after romancing her and being filled with the awe of Planet Plandora. In fact, such action changed his ideology. Unlike a true Marine, he digressed from the mission (originally to persuade the Plandora people to relocate so the military could gain valuable minerals contained beneath their planet’s surface). Although technically sci-fi, there were definite socio-political undertones to the film, which caught my conservative radar. Avatar roots itself firmly enough in Bush-era colloquialisms to carry an air of politically charged discomfort. And in this film, there was a lot white/western-guilt pulls going on. In this film, the cowboy archetype losses to “indigenous”, blue-people aliens, who in the end win, but not without costs. Was Avatar Hollywood’s passive-aggressive production of sending a message to American war-mongers to stop overpowering others for their own social-political gain? That in war, loss occurs on both sides. You be the judge.

The opposition is not interested in curing global warming, universal national health care insurance, or any other massive program except in how they help their underlying agenda. Whatever you want to call it, the net effect is statism or centralizing power to a government. Any government. If not the United States Congress or the Supreme Court or the presidency then to the United Nations. Someone who will take all personal responsibility off of the individual. Someone to blame for everything. This is why the conservative arguments are not making headway. This is why the conservative agenda is not capable of getting traction in our society.
|
||||||
My friend over at Liberty Pen has posted another great video on his YouTube channel. Milton Friedman is one of his major subjects and this video is an interview on TV from back in the early 60's. Friedman gives one of the best arguments against modern liberalism. Topics covered include Social Security, Minimum Wage, and The Great Depression. But the key statement was his comment on the adjectives we use as titles. He says, "I consider myself a liberal in the truest sense of the word, while those who call themselves liberal today are actually conservative. They are conservative in the truest sense of the word because they want to preserve the course this nation is on which is bigger government and moving toward socialism. They think of themselves as soft hearted but the softness has moved into their heads. You know, I want the poor to be helped and for the underemployed to make a living wage, but the laws and policies they want to implement don't get the results they are seeking. A worker with low skills doesn't get higher wages because the law forces the employer to avoid hiring him at all. People I would trust personally actively lie to the American public because they believe these policies are best for the public. For instance, with the Social Security program, the law states that the employee pays half and the employer pays half but the truth is the employee pays all of it. If the employer is able to afford (adjusting for the times) $15.00 per hour he subtracts the amount going out for taxes and benefits so that the employee is actually taking home $8.50 for each hour he works. The rest goes to the government to manage for him." Considering that is nearly half the employee's earning power, you've yet to figure in sales, property, estate, and a slew of other taxes. So if we figured the government's true cost, we can only conclude that the government's take is nearly 60% of our earning power with some 15% coming back in very limited benefits they should have no authority to purchase and dole out.
![]() | |
| |
![]() |
|
Please forgive any sloppiness in this post, I've only got an hour to punch this one out but I felt it too important to let pass unaddressed.

by Neale Donald Walsch
(Hampton Roads Publishing Company, Inc., 1997)
Book 2 has been on the best seller lists for 120 weeks and the secular and 'spiritual' people are loving it because it promotes all the anti-wisdom crap the unlearned in spiritual matters, love. Examples follow:
1. "On a blank sheet of paper, I would merely write a question. . . and no sooner was the question written than the answer would form in my head, as if Someone were whispering in my ear. I was taking dictation!"
(Hampton Roads Publishing Company, Inc., 1997)
This alleged state of imperfection in which you are said to come into this world is what your religionists have the gall to call original sin. . . Some of your religions have built up whole theologies around this misconception. . . Yet, in order to justify the idea of a punitive God, your religions needed to create something for me to be angry about.. . . Sop you’d better do something about all of this… or you’ll go straight to hell. This, in the end, may do nothing to mollify a weird, vindictive, angry God, but it does give life to weird, vindictive, angry religions. (119-120. See also 136)
Only humans are judgmental, and because you are, you assume that I must be. Yet I am not…. (183)
The ability to discern truth is not our natural state. We are a fallen people, ie. programmed to love self destruction. a.k.a. sin. It is only through the study of truth, especially in spiritual matters, that we can overcome this love of self destruction. "As you have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him, rooted and built up in Him and established in the faith, as you have been taught, abounding in it with thanksgiving. Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ." (Colossians 2:6-8)
Walsch's sole authority is a blank piece of paper and his imagination. Oh yeah, and your willingness to accept what you want to believe about God.
3REINCARNATION
NDW: Is there such a thing as reincarnation?
God: You have had 647 past lives, since you insist on being exact. This is your 648th. You were everything in them. A king, a queen, a serf…. No, there is not such thing as karmic debt – not in the sense that you mean… You are not obligated to do anything. (204)
PSYCHIC POWER
Using psychic ability is nothing more than using your sixth sense. Obviously, this is not "trafficking with the devil," or I would not have given this sense to you. And, of course, there is no devil with whom to traffic. (205)
SEX
NDW: Is sex okay?
God: Of course sex is "okay." … Play with sex. Play with it! It’s wonderful fun. (205)
Sex is sacred, too… But joy and sacredness do mix (they are in fact the same thing)… You have repressed sex, even as you have repressed life, rather than fully Self expressing with abandon and joy. You have shamed sex, even as you have shamed life, calling it evil and wicked, rather than the highest gift and the greatest pleasure. 207
The energy that which underscores sex is the energy which underscores life… 207
Walsch bought and sells the idea that there is no limitation on your behavior or desires. There is no devil, there is no harm, there is no cost or consequence. If the physical realm teaches us anything, it teaches us that there is danger in ignorance and undisciplined living. The same is true in the spiritual realm. There are dangers that God is constantly telling us about, has given us oracles and the Bible to inform us about.
Please watch what your kids are being given to read and encouraged to follow. Don't allow the state run schools to be your kids' spiritual guides. Don't allow Walsch and Oprah and Tom Cruz to be your spiritual guides. Test every spirit and know whether they are your enemy or your friend. Be wise in the knowledge of what makes an enemy an enemy and a friend a friend. Teaching you to follow habits and practices that will lead to your own destruction or reinforcing the beliefs you want to hold is the work of an enemy. A friend will tell you when you are heading into a fun self destruction and will tell you off loudly and persistently until you straighten up and walk the way of real life and benefit.
![]() | |
| |
![]() |
.
Congressional candidate Lieutenant Colonel West speaking at the
American Freedom tour in Fort Lauderdale Florida at the Revolution
Nightclub.
For more information about the West for Congress campaign or to become involved please follow this link http://allenwestforcongress.com/.



Email
post (#2) by H. Hamilton – A report written by a concerned CA citizen
attending the Board of Inquiry for LtCol Jeffrey Chessani.
Major
Jeffrey Dinsmore was LtCol Chessani’s intelligence officer. He has
served as an active-duty Marine for over 23 years. In yesterday’s
testimony, he informed Board members of the complexity of the daylong
engagement in Haditha on November 19, 2005. He also informed the Board
his intelligence assessment before November 19, 2005 indicated Marines
were going to be attacked in Hadtiha that day. Follow-on intelligence
after November 19, 2005 confirmed to Major Dinsmore and LtCol Chessani
that the attack on November 19, 2005 was one they were expecting from
foreign fighters—namely Syrians.
Next
to testify, was Major Luke McConnell, company commander of the Marines
originally charged in the case. He explained to Board members that he
spoke to his Marines, as their commanding officer, during and after the
engagement. He personally fought in the engagement. He confirmed his
company was in a daylong battle with insurgents. He also went to where
the Marines entered homes to clear out insurgents. Major McConnell was
briefed by Lieutenant Kallop, the units platoon leader, that he ordered
the Marines to clear the homes of insurgents and unfortunately there
were civilians killed as collateral damage.
Email post by H. Hamilton – The report from a concerned CA citizen attending the Board of Inquiry for LtCol Jeffrey Chessani.